SoN 26: The System of Building Your AI Style Guide


Signal Over Noise #26

October 29th, 2025

Dear Reader,

Last week, I wrote about why your personal voice matters, and how AI can act as an accessibility layer to help your voice become a differentiator and rise above all the 'AI slop' that everyone else is churning out.

This week, in Part 2, we're building that style guide that teaches AI how to amplify your voice.

This isn't theory. This is what I use every day, embedded in my AI thinking partner. The specific prompts, the iteration process, the editing workflow. And because I keep it as a separate document, I can move it to another AI if I stop using the one I'm currently working with.

But enough already — Let's build yours. :-)


What We're Building

A plain text document that teaches AI what your voice actually sounds like. Not just “be conversational” or “be professional” — but the specific patterns, word choices, structures, and quirks that make your writing distinctively yours. The goal: AI helps you sound more like yourself by structuring scattered thoughts, maintaining consistency, catching unclear moments, and preserving your voice while improving clarity.


Step 1: Gather Examples of Your Best Writing

Start with 5-10 pieces where your voice feels strongest. Different formats — newsletters, blog posts, social media, even text messages or emails. Look for writing where you weren’t trying to sound professional, pieces that got strong responses from people who know you, content where you felt natural, not performative.

Why this matters: AI needs examples, not descriptions. “Be conversational” means nothing. Your actual conversational writing gives AI patterns to learn.


Step 2: Have AI Analyse Your Voice

Here’s the exact prompt I use:

Analyse these writing samples and create a comprehensive style guide that captures my voice. Include:
- Sentence structure patterns (length, rhythm, variety)
- Word choices and vocabulary levelTone and formality level
- How I use transitionsPunctuation habits
- What I avoid (THIS IS CRITICAL)
- Specific phrases or structures I favour
- How I address readers
- What makes this voice distinctive
Be specific. Don’t give me generic advice like “conversational tone.” Tell me exactly what patterns you see.

The first time I did this, Claude told me things like:

  • “You use short, punchy sentences after longer explanatory ones for emphasis”
  • “You frequently start sentences with ‘But’ and ‘And’ despite grammar rules”
  • “You use questions to reader as transitions between sections”
  • “You acknowledge difficulty directly rather than glossing over complexity”

I knew I did some of these things, but seeing them systematically documented was revealing.


Step 3: Output Project Instructions

Now you need to get AI to take that analysis and put it somewhere useful, with a prompt like this:

Using my new defined tone of voice, write some project instructions for Claude or ChatGPT to help make sure any writing I do keeps within the defined tone of voice.

Then download the results to a file or copy/paste them into a new text file. Upload that to a new project in ChatGPT, Claude or upload it as a source to a new Notebook LM notebook.


Step 4: Refine the Style Guide

AI’s first draft won’t be perfect. Edit it based on what feels accurate, what’s missing, what it got wrong, and especially what you don’t sound like.

Example from mine:

Some things I do:

  • Use em dashes for emphasis and rhythm
  • Start paragraphs with “But,” “And,” “Because”
  • Write contractions — I write like I talk
  • Swear occasionally when it fits
  • Acknowledge when things are hard

Some things I DON’T do:

  • Never use “moreover” or “furthermore”
  • Never say “utilize” when “use” works fine
  • Don’t hedge with corporate speak
  • Don’t pretend everything is easy
  • Don’t use motivational platitudes
  • Don’t write in third person about myself

The “Don’t” list matters more than you think. Telling AI what to avoid is often more powerful than telling it what to do.


Step 5: Test and Iterate

Use the style guide for a few writing sessions and notice where AI still sounds off. Update the guide.

My process:

  1. Keep style guide in Obsidian (but yours can be anywhere)
  2. Reference it at start of every significant writing session
  3. Write something using the guide
  4. Read it aloud
  5. Notice when output sounds “off”
  6. Add specifics to guide about what felt wrong
  7. Repeat

Your voice changes over time, so your guide should too. I update mine every few weeks based on what’s working and what isn’t.

After three months of iteration, my style guide went from one page of generic observations to three pages of specific patterns, including things like “Uses ‘here’s the thing’ as transition to main point” and “Breaks grammar rules intentionally for emphasis.”

That specificity makes all the difference.


Your Challenge This Week

Here’s what to do:

  1. Gather your writing samples (5-10 pieces that feel most “you”)
  2. Run the analysis prompt (copy the one from Step 2 above)
  3. Create your first-draft style guide (refine AI’s analysis with your own observations)
  4. Test it on one piece of writing (notice what works and what doesn’t)
  5. Iterate (update the guide based on what you learned)

The questions to ask yourself:

  • Does this sound like me?
  • Could someone who knows me identify this as mine?
  • Am I amplifying my voice or replacing it?
  • Is AI helping me think more clearly or thinking for me?

For people who need this most:

If you’re neurodivergent, if you’re a non-native speaker, if you have accessibility challenges, if your brain moves faster than your typing, if you have brilliant ideas trapped inside your head — this isn’t cheating. This is levelling the playing field.

Build your style guide, teach AI your voice, and use it to finally be heard the way you deserve to be.

AI should make you more efficiently yourself. Not more formal, not more impressive — just more clearly YOU.

Want the complete editing process, common pitfalls guide, and corporate implementation strategies? Check the Signal Over Noise community on Skool for details.

Until next week,

Jim


Signal Over Noise is weekly, reader-first publication on AI "without the hype" published by Jim Christian. If you've been forwarded this issue, you can subscribe for free: go.signalovernoise.at


Made with ❤️ in Valencia by Jim Christian. For feedback, please reach out to hello@jimchristian.net.

600 1st Ave, Ste 330 PMB 92768, Seattle, WA 98104-2246
Unsubscribe · Preferences

Jim Christian - Signal Over Noise

What I care about is helping people bring technology into their lives well — where it's genuinely needed, and where it can do the most good. Not tech for its own sake, not change to look modern. Sometimes that means AI; just as often it means something far simpler.The tech world is accelerating. This is my attempt to slow things down a little: to pick apart the hype and look for the reality and the truth in the messages — primarily around AI, and how it impacts us all.

Read more from Jim Christian - Signal Over Noise

VOL 2, ISSUE 36 · 19 SEPTEMBER 2026 Space to be human Last week I wrote about leaving the Mac for Omarchy after 25 years, and ended on being one step closer to a co-operating system that works with me instead of one I have to work around. A lot of this week comes back to that: creating my own co-operating system from the tools available. This past week has been a major 'back to school' week for the family, including new travelling times, and a massive storm that came through the area mid-week...

VOL 2, ISSUE 35 · 11 SEPTEMBER 2026 Why I left the Mac for Omarchy after 25 years Last weekend I installed Omarchy alongside macOS on my M2 MacBook Air. Support was hit or miss on the Mac, but I was hooked. I realised this was an operating system I wanted to live with. After more than 25 years primarily using Macs, I bought a Lenovo ThinkPad and made it my daily machine. I did not expect to be buying a computer last week, let alone a PC. The switch happened during a revealing week for Apple....

VOL 2, ISSUE 34 · 4 SEPTEMBER 2026 Handing off the 60% If planning, researching and strategising take up, say, 40% of a task, then 60% is left to execute and iterate. That 60% can take up 100% of your available time if you're doing it manually. This is the week that argument stopped being theoretical for me. The kids are home, my partner is at work, and the writing happens in the gaps — text the agent, deal a new hand of Go Fish, check what came back. It's also the week I started calling...